Maryland closed its county ICE detention beds under a 2021 state law, and most people arrested by ICE in Maryland are now transferred to facilities in Louisiana, Texas, or other states within days of custody. Our Vienna, Virginia office files federal habeas corpus petitions for Maryland residents in the District of Maryland and, when transfers have already occurred, in the receiving district as well.
Maryland's ICE detention landscape looks very different than it did a few years ago. Under the 2021 Dignity Not Detention Act, Frederick, Worcester, and Howard county facilities all ended their ICE contracts, effectively removing hundreds of in-state detention beds. Today ICE typically holds Maryland detainees in temporary processing rooms in Baltimore or Salisbury and then transfers them to out-of-state detention facilities, usually within days. When bond is denied, when custody stretches past what the law allows, or when a transfer has already sent a Maryland resident to Louisiana, Texas, or another state, a federal habeas corpus petition may be the fastest path to meaningful review for someone detained by ICE in Maryland.
Enforcement across Maryland is coordinated by the Baltimore Field Office. Because Maryland no longer has dedicated ICE detention facilities, the state's active detention footprint is limited to short-term holding at ICE field offices and a small number of contested projects:
Because in-state capacity is so limited, over 3,300 Maryland residents were detained by ICE in 2025, roughly twice the previous year, and most were transferred out of state. Reporting indicates that about three out of four were sent to Louisiana or Texas, with others transferred to Pennsylvania, Virginia, and elsewhere. Those long-distance transfers can shift federal habeas jurisdiction to the receiving district and, in many cases, to a less favorable circuit.
Most habeas petitions we file for people detained by ICE in Maryland or transferred out of Maryland fall into a few recurring patterns:
Each is a distinct fact pattern where a federal habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 may reset the review process. Which one fits depends on the specific timeline and record.
Maryland sits within the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, based in Richmond, Virginia. The Fourth Circuit has ruled on prolonged detention, mandatory detention under INA § 236(c), and the availability of bond hearings after extended custody. Because Maryland shares the Fourth Circuit with Virginia, Maryland habeas petitions can draw on the same body of precedent that has developed alongside Virginia litigation. See our overview of prolonged detention challenges for how these arguments are typically framed.
The practical challenge in Maryland is that many detainees are transferred out of the Fourth Circuit before a petition can be filed. Detainees processed in Baltimore or Salisbury are often moved within days to facilities in the Fifth Circuit (Louisiana, Texas), where the case law is less favorable, or the Third Circuit (Pennsylvania), where different precedent applies. Timing often matters as much as the underlying facts, and preserving Fourth Circuit jurisdiction by filing before a transfer can meaningfully change the outcome.
An immigration court bond hearing and a federal habeas petition are two different tools. Bond hearings happen inside the immigration system before an immigration judge and address only whether the person can be released. Habeas petitions are filed in federal district court under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and ask an Article III judge to review whether the immigration detention itself is constitutional and statutorily authorized.
The two tracks often work in sequence. When ICE argues that a person is subject to mandatory detention with no right to a bond hearing, habeas is frequently the only remaining avenue. When bond has been denied and detention has already stretched for months, habeas can force a second look under a different legal standard. Our guide comparing habeas corpus and immigration bond hearings walks through when each tool tends to fit for someone detained by ICE in Maryland.
The first hours after a Maryland ICE arrest are especially important because transfers happen quickly. Concrete steps:
Baltimore, MD
Field Office / Holding SiteSalisbury, MD
Field Office / Holding SiteIf your loved one is detained by ICE in Maryland, a federal habeas corpus petition may be the most effective legal tool available. Unlike immigration court proceedings, habeas petitions are filed in U.S. District Court before an independent federal judge — not a government employee.
We handle complex cases, including:
Maryland has a single federal judicial district, the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, with courthouses in Baltimore and Greenbelt.
The District of Maryland is the correct forum for a habeas petition when the person is being held anywhere in Maryland, including the Baltimore and Salisbury field offices. Baltimore is the primary courthouse and handles the majority of Maryland's ICE detention habeas litigation. The Greenbelt courthouse serves the D.C. suburbs and southern Maryland.
Because most Maryland detainees are transferred out of state within days, many habeas petitions for Maryland residents end up filed in other districts, including the Western District of Louisiana, various Texas districts, the Middle and Western Districts of Pennsylvania, and the Eastern and Western Districts of Virginia. Which district applies depends on where the person is being held at the time the petition is filed.
The District of Maryland falls under the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, based in Richmond, Virginia. Because Maryland and Virginia share the Fourth Circuit, decisions from either state's federal courts carry precedential weight in both. Filing procedures for the District of Maryland are published on the ICE Detention Facility Locator and on the district's court website.
Tell us about your situation. We'll review the case and let you know if a federal challenge is possible.
Tell us about your loved one’s situation. We’ll review the case and give you a clear path forward—no cost, no obligation.